Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Continuing offence of money-laundering: discharge set aside and proceedings reinstated where laundering continued after inclusion of predicate offence...
TDS credit claims not reflected in Form 26AS require AO verification before allowance; the appellate direction permitting credit where Form 26AS shows TDS, or where the assessee produces evidence plus an indemnity bond, is valid only if the AO conducts necessary verification. The Tribunal found CIT(A) did not mandate unconditional credit but correctly required verification and therefore dismissed Revenue's challenge and the assessee's cross-objection, upholding that credits may be allowed after the AO's appropriate verification.
TDS credit claims not reflected in Form 26AS require AO verification before allowance; the appellate direction permitting credit where Form 26AS shows TDS, or where the assessee produces evidence plus an indemnity bond, is valid only if the AO conducts necessary verification. The Tribunal found CIT(A) did not mandate unconditional credit but correctly required verification and therefore dismissed Revenue's challenge and the assessee's cross-objection, upholding that credits may be allowed after the AO's appropriate verification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
