Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
TDS credit claims not reflected in Form 26AS require AO verification before allowance; the appellate direction permitting credit where Form 26AS shows TDS, or where the assessee produces evidence plus an indemnity bond, is valid only if the AO conducts necessary verification. The Tribunal found CIT(A) did not mandate unconditional credit but correctly required verification and therefore dismissed Revenue's challenge and the assessee's cross-objection, upholding that credits may be allowed after the AO's appropriate verification.
TDS credit claims not reflected in Form 26AS require AO verification before allowance; the appellate direction permitting credit where Form 26AS shows TDS, or where the assessee produces evidence plus an indemnity bond, is valid only if the AO conducts necessary verification. The Tribunal found CIT(A) did not mandate unconditional credit but correctly required verification and therefore dismissed Revenue's challenge and the assessee's cross-objection, upholding that credits may be allowed after the AO's appropriate verification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
