Transfer pricing comparables and adjustments: Tribunal revisits loss-maker status, segmental comparability, working capital relief, and risk allocatio...
Business expenditure disallowance failed where commission, related-party salary and promotion payments were supported by records and inquiry was inade...
TDS credit claims not reflected in Form 26AS require AO verification before allowance; the appellate direction permitting credit where Form 26AS shows TDS, or where the assessee produces evidence plus an indemnity bond, is valid only if the AO conducts necessary verification. The Tribunal found CIT(A) did not mandate unconditional credit but correctly required verification and therefore dismissed Revenue's challenge and the assessee's cross-objection, upholding that credits may be allowed after the AO's appropriate verification.
TDS credit claims not reflected in Form 26AS require AO verification before allowance; the appellate direction permitting credit where Form 26AS shows TDS, or where the assessee produces evidence plus an indemnity bond, is valid only if the AO conducts necessary verification. The Tribunal found CIT(A) did not mandate unconditional credit but correctly required verification and therefore dismissed Revenue's challenge and the assessee's cross-objection, upholding that credits may be allowed after the AO's appropriate verification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
