Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Continuing offence of money-laundering: discharge set aside and proceedings reinstated where laundering continued after inclusion of predicate offence...
A purposive, see-through construction of Section 29A was applied to assess resolution applicant eligibility, focusing on de facto control, cross-shareholdings, post-resolution asset transfers and retained promoter involvement; on that legal basis the applicant was held disqualified under clause (c) and, on the facts and purposive assessment, clause (j), rendering it ineligible. The Tribunal found deficiencies in CoC/RP material and reasoning and identified a duty on the RP under Regulation 36A to verify eligibility. The Tribunal declined to recall its earlier direction to resume the CIRP from issuance of a fresh Form G and directed continuation while IBBI conducts an independent inquiry into procedural and disclosure issues.
A purposive, see-through construction of Section 29A was applied to assess resolution applicant eligibility, focusing on de facto control, cross-shareholdings, post-resolution asset transfers and retained promoter involvement; on that legal basis the applicant was held disqualified under clause (c) and, on the facts and purposive assessment, clause (j), rendering it ineligible. The Tribunal found deficiencies in CoC/RP material and reasoning and identified a duty on the RP under Regulation 36A to verify eligibility. The Tribunal declined to recall its earlier direction to resume the CIRP from issuance of a fresh Form G and directed continuation while IBBI conducts an independent inquiry into procedural and disclosure issues.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
