Inventory write-off and fraudulent/wrongful trading allegations in corporate insolvency led to director liability principles applied and appeal dismis...
Condonation of delay in filing GSTR-3B returns and entitlement to Section 62 benefit results in withdrawal of assessments and revocation of attachment...
A purposive, see-through construction of Section 29A was applied to assess resolution applicant eligibility, focusing on de facto control, cross-shareholdings, post-resolution asset transfers and retained promoter involvement; on that legal basis the applicant was held disqualified under clause (c) and, on the facts and purposive assessment, clause (j), rendering it ineligible. The Tribunal found deficiencies in CoC/RP material and reasoning and identified a duty on the RP under Regulation 36A to verify eligibility. The Tribunal declined to recall its earlier direction to resume the CIRP from issuance of a fresh Form G and directed continuation while IBBI conducts an independent inquiry into procedural and disclosure issues.
A purposive, see-through construction of Section 29A was applied to assess resolution applicant eligibility, focusing on de facto control, cross-shareholdings, post-resolution asset transfers and retained promoter involvement; on that legal basis the applicant was held disqualified under clause (c) and, on the facts and purposive assessment, clause (j), rendering it ineligible. The Tribunal found deficiencies in CoC/RP material and reasoning and identified a duty on the RP under Regulation 36A to verify eligibility. The Tribunal declined to recall its earlier direction to resume the CIRP from issuance of a fresh Form G and directed continuation while IBBI conducts an independent inquiry into procedural and disclosure issues.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
