Expenses for overseas film shooting treated as services availed outside India, so no reverse charge service tax liability; cenvat reversals and penalt...
Electricity consumptionbased clandestine production estimates under the repealed Central Excise Act found insufficient; demand quashed and appeals all...
A purposive, see-through construction of Section 29A was applied to assess resolution applicant eligibility, focusing on de facto control, cross-shareholdings, post-resolution asset transfers and retained promoter involvement; on that legal basis the applicant was held disqualified under clause (c) and, on the facts and purposive assessment, clause (j), rendering it ineligible. The Tribunal found deficiencies in CoC/RP material and reasoning and identified a duty on the RP under Regulation 36A to verify eligibility. The Tribunal declined to recall its earlier direction to resume the CIRP from issuance of a fresh Form G and directed continuation while IBBI conducts an independent inquiry into procedural and disclosure issues.
A purposive, see-through construction of Section 29A was applied to assess resolution applicant eligibility, focusing on de facto control, cross-shareholdings, post-resolution asset transfers and retained promoter involvement; on that legal basis the applicant was held disqualified under clause (c) and, on the facts and purposive assessment, clause (j), rendering it ineligible. The Tribunal found deficiencies in CoC/RP material and reasoning and identified a duty on the RP under Regulation 36A to verify eligibility. The Tribunal declined to recall its earlier direction to resume the CIRP from issuance of a fresh Form G and directed continuation while IBBI conducts an independent inquiry into procedural and disclosure issues.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
