Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Provisional attachment under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act was confirmed where seized institutional records, mark sheet registers and corroborative documentary information established large scale issuance of forged degrees and diversion of funds as proceeds of crime; appellants served notice under section 8(1) failed to satisfactorily disclose legitimate sources for attached movable and immovable properties, so the attachment was sustained. The absence of recovery of individual forged degree certificates did not negate the seizure-based foundation for attachment. Documents filed in rejoinder amounted to new evidence and were inadmissible without formal application and Tribunal permission; appeals dismissed.
Provisional attachment under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act was confirmed where seized institutional records, mark sheet registers and corroborative documentary information established large scale issuance of forged degrees and diversion of funds as proceeds of crime; appellants served notice under section 8(1) failed to satisfactorily disclose legitimate sources for attached movable and immovable properties, so the attachment was sustained. The absence of recovery of individual forged degree certificates did not negate the seizure-based foundation for attachment. Documents filed in rejoinder amounted to new evidence and were inadmissible without formal application and Tribunal permission; appeals dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.