Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
Determination of proceeds of crime by calculating excess excavation as wrongful gain is upheld where documentary records and statements establish quantities beyond permitted limits; appellants failed to discharge the statutory onus to show legitimate source, so disclosed returns did not displace the calculation. Property acquired with excess income is treated as proceeds of crime, and where tainted property is not traceable the value of equivalent property (including assets purchased before the offence) may be provisionally attached subject to established safeguards and tests; provisional attachments were therefore confirmed.
Determination of proceeds of crime by calculating excess excavation as wrongful gain is upheld where documentary records and statements establish quantities beyond permitted limits; appellants failed to discharge the statutory onus to show legitimate source, so disclosed returns did not displace the calculation. Property acquired with excess income is treated as proceeds of crime, and where tainted property is not traceable the value of equivalent property (including assets purchased before the offence) may be provisionally attached subject to established safeguards and tests; provisional attachments were therefore confirmed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
