Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Entitlement to concessional IGST at 0.1% under Notification No. 41/2017-I.T.(Rate) turns on strict compliance with the Notification's prescribed conditions, particularly that the registered recipient must place an order on the registered supplier and goods must move from the registered supplier either directly to the export point or to a registered warehouse as specified. The court held that the scheme contemplates only the registered supplier and registered recipient and that supply to a third party does not meet the conditions; purposive construction in favour of the taxpayer could not override clear, express conditions. Outcome: concession denied and writ dismissed.
Entitlement to concessional IGST at 0.1% under Notification No. 41/2017-I.T.(Rate) turns on strict compliance with the Notification's prescribed conditions, particularly that the registered recipient must place an order on the registered supplier and goods must move from the registered supplier either directly to the export point or to a registered warehouse as specified. The court held that the scheme contemplates only the registered supplier and registered recipient and that supply to a third party does not meet the conditions; purposive construction in favour of the taxpayer could not override clear, express conditions. Outcome: concession denied and writ dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
