Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 16(5), as inserted retrospectively from 01.07.2017, extends and overrides the time limit under Section 16(4) for claiming input tax credit for financial years 2017 18 to 2020 21, so returns filed within the extended cut off are not barred merely by the earlier time limit; orders denying ITC solely on that time bar were set aside. The matter is remitted to the assessing authority to determine factual eligibility for the claimed ITC, permitting factual reassessment but not re-opening the legal conclusion on the extended time limit.
Section 16(5), as inserted retrospectively from 01.07.2017, extends and overrides the time limit under Section 16(4) for claiming input tax credit for financial years 2017 18 to 2020 21, so returns filed within the extended cut off are not barred merely by the earlier time limit; orders denying ITC solely on that time bar were set aside. The matter is remitted to the assessing authority to determine factual eligibility for the claimed ITC, permitting factual reassessment but not re-opening the legal conclusion on the extended time limit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
