Assessment time-barred u/s 153 due to missing competent-authority reference for Singapore exchange of information; assessment disallowed as barred by ...
Imported menthol-scented sweet supari classification dispute: seizure quashed, release for home consumption subject to duty bond; bank guarantee refus...
CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
A penalty under tax law was quashed because the initiating notice failed to specify which limb of the penalty provision applied and did not strike out the inapplicable limb; the procedural defect meant the penalty order proceeded without a valid notice. The commentary highlights that notices must identify the specific limb relied on (distinguishing furnishing inaccurate particulars from concealment) and that failure to do so vitiates penalty proceedings. The practical effect is that penalties based on such defective notices are invalid and liable to be set aside.
A penalty under tax law was quashed because the initiating notice failed to specify which limb of the penalty provision applied and did not strike out the inapplicable limb; the procedural defect meant the penalty order proceeded without a valid notice. The commentary highlights that notices must identify the specific limb relied on (distinguishing furnishing inaccurate particulars from concealment) and that failure to do so vitiates penalty proceedings. The practical effect is that penalties based on such defective notices are invalid and liable to be set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.