Unregistered profit-sharing agreements cannot justify occupation of corporate debtor premises during CIRP; repossession by the Resolution Professional...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2881 to 2900 of 96363 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Tribunal held that clause (i) of the statutory provision defining specified domestic transactions was omitted with retrospective effect, applying established precedent on retrospective omission so the provision is treated as never having existed; consequently references to the Transfer Pricing Officer and transfer pricing adjustments for the relevant assessment year were invalid and the additions based solely on that provision were directed to be deleted, leading to allowance of the appeal and removal of the contested additions.
Tribunal held that clause (i) of the statutory provision defining specified domestic transactions was omitted with retrospective effect, applying established precedent on retrospective omission so the provision is treated as never having existed; consequently references to the Transfer Pricing Officer and transfer pricing adjustments for the relevant assessment year were invalid and the additions based solely on that provision were directed to be deleted, leading to allowance of the appeal and removal of the contested additions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.