Misdeclaration of quantity rejected where supplier evidence established counting errors, so reassessment, confiscation and redemption fine were set as...
Admissibility of electronic evidence controls valuation and penalty exposure; non compliant e records and statements nullify revaluation and penalties...
Tribunal held that AMP expenses can, in principle, constitute an international transaction but their existence must be established by tangible material rather than by application of the Bright Line Test (BLT). The BLT lacks statutory mandate and cannot be used to compute or convert protective adjustments into substantive TP adjustments. On the facts the assessee's disclosed and adjusted gross margins exceed comparables, so adequacy of compensation for AMP expenses was found and upward transfer pricing adjustments by TPO/DRP were struck down for the years under appeal.
Tribunal held that AMP expenses can, in principle, constitute an international transaction but their existence must be established by tangible material rather than by application of the Bright Line Test (BLT). The BLT lacks statutory mandate and cannot be used to compute or convert protective adjustments into substantive TP adjustments. On the facts the assessee's disclosed and adjusted gross margins exceed comparables, so adequacy of compensation for AMP expenses was found and upward transfer pricing adjustments by TPO/DRP were struck down for the years under appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
