Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
Rejection of declared transaction value was upheld where an interlocking body of contemporaneous private and electronic records, parallel invoices and voluntary admissions established that declared invoices omitted true consideration; such electronic records, corroborated by admissions, were admitted as probative. Given fabricated documents, clandestine payments and unreliable comparables, the Tribunal applied the residual valuation method under Rule 9 to re determine assessable value and sustained demand for differential duty with automatic interest. The Tribunal lawfully invoked extended limitation on findings of deliberate non disclosure, upheld confiscation for conscious misdeclaration with redemption option, and affirmed mandatory and personal penalties for fraud or wilful suppression on the record of admissions and corroborative documents.
Rejection of declared transaction value was upheld where an interlocking body of contemporaneous private and electronic records, parallel invoices and voluntary admissions established that declared invoices omitted true consideration; such electronic records, corroborated by admissions, were admitted as probative. Given fabricated documents, clandestine payments and unreliable comparables, the Tribunal applied the residual valuation method under Rule 9 to re determine assessable value and sustained demand for differential duty with automatic interest. The Tribunal lawfully invoked extended limitation on findings of deliberate non disclosure, upheld confiscation for conscious misdeclaration with redemption option, and affirmed mandatory and personal penalties for fraud or wilful suppression on the record of admissions and corroborative documents.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.