Validity of faceless assessment procedure challenged for jurisdictional AO intervention mid-remand, resulting in quashing of assessment for procedural...
Inventory write-off and fraudulent/wrongful trading allegations in corporate insolvency led to director liability principles applied and appeal dismis...
Initiation of contempt proceedings by issuance of a show cause notice does not ordinarily create an appealable right because it does not adjudicate substantial rights; accordingly the appellate forum declined to entertain the appeal against the notice but granted liberty to the respondent to file a reply to the notice before the tribunal. An interim disclosure direction concerning transactions was treated as superseded and its subject matter subsumed in a pending substantive appeal, so the separate appeal on that disclosure was dismissed as unnecessary and related pending applications were disposed of.
Initiation of contempt proceedings by issuance of a show cause notice does not ordinarily create an appealable right because it does not adjudicate substantial rights; accordingly the appellate forum declined to entertain the appeal against the notice but granted liberty to the respondent to file a reply to the notice before the tribunal. An interim disclosure direction concerning transactions was treated as superseded and its subject matter subsumed in a pending substantive appeal, so the separate appeal on that disclosure was dismissed as unnecessary and related pending applications were disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.