Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Initiation of contempt proceedings by issuance of a show cause notice does not ordinarily create an appealable right because it does not adjudicate substantial rights; accordingly the appellate forum declined to entertain the appeal against the notice but granted liberty to the respondent to file a reply to the notice before the tribunal. An interim disclosure direction concerning transactions was treated as superseded and its subject matter subsumed in a pending substantive appeal, so the separate appeal on that disclosure was dismissed as unnecessary and related pending applications were disposed of.
Initiation of contempt proceedings by issuance of a show cause notice does not ordinarily create an appealable right because it does not adjudicate substantial rights; accordingly the appellate forum declined to entertain the appeal against the notice but granted liberty to the respondent to file a reply to the notice before the tribunal. An interim disclosure direction concerning transactions was treated as superseded and its subject matter subsumed in a pending substantive appeal, so the separate appeal on that disclosure was dismissed as unnecessary and related pending applications were disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.