Consultancy fees claimed as business expense-can tax disallowance rest on survey suspicion despite invoices, contracts and bank trail? Appeal dismisse...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7501 to 7520 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Adverse findings require articulation of the evidential basis and engagement with material facts; where an order imposes penalty on an individual for alleged aiding and abetting but records only conclusory statements that the person received and transferred funds without discussing or identifying supporting evidence, the lack of reasons is fatal and justifies setting aside the penalty and remittal. The operative legal point is that tribunals and adjudicating authorities must record reasoned findings tying conclusions to specific evidence, failing which the affected order cannot be sustained.
Adverse findings require articulation of the evidential basis and engagement with material facts; where an order imposes penalty on an individual for alleged aiding and abetting but records only conclusory statements that the person received and transferred funds without discussing or identifying supporting evidence, the lack of reasons is fatal and justifies setting aside the penalty and remittal. The operative legal point is that tribunals and adjudicating authorities must record reasoned findings tying conclusions to specific evidence, failing which the affected order cannot be sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.