Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Induction of a strategic investor into a bidding consortium under Regulation 39(1B) was held compliant where the consortium disclosed the investor in a revised plan, the resolution professional performed eligibility and Section 29A checks, a consortium agreement existed, revised plans were circulated and e voting occurred; the induction was not a surreptitious circumvention and related RFRP contractual modification was permissible, so the contrary finding was set aside. The alleged material irregularity for delayed circulation to erstwhile directors failed on the documented chronology and e voting opportunity. The CoC's unanimous commercial choice was treated as within its commercial wisdom and not for substitution by the adjudicatory forum.
Induction of a strategic investor into a bidding consortium under Regulation 39(1B) was held compliant where the consortium disclosed the investor in a revised plan, the resolution professional performed eligibility and Section 29A checks, a consortium agreement existed, revised plans were circulated and e voting occurred; the induction was not a surreptitious circumvention and related RFRP contractual modification was permissible, so the contrary finding was set aside. The alleged material irregularity for delayed circulation to erstwhile directors failed on the documented chronology and e voting opportunity. The CoC's unanimous commercial choice was treated as within its commercial wisdom and not for substitution by the adjudicatory forum.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
