Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Induction of a strategic investor into a bidding consortium under Regulation 39(1B) was held compliant where the consortium disclosed the investor in a revised plan, the resolution professional performed eligibility and Section 29A checks, a consortium agreement existed, revised plans were circulated and e voting occurred; the induction was not a surreptitious circumvention and related RFRP contractual modification was permissible, so the contrary finding was set aside. The alleged material irregularity for delayed circulation to erstwhile directors failed on the documented chronology and e voting opportunity. The CoC's unanimous commercial choice was treated as within its commercial wisdom and not for substitution by the adjudicatory forum.
Induction of a strategic investor into a bidding consortium under Regulation 39(1B) was held compliant where the consortium disclosed the investor in a revised plan, the resolution professional performed eligibility and Section 29A checks, a consortium agreement existed, revised plans were circulated and e voting occurred; the induction was not a surreptitious circumvention and related RFRP contractual modification was permissible, so the contrary finding was set aside. The alleged material irregularity for delayed circulation to erstwhile directors failed on the documented chronology and e voting opportunity. The CoC's unanimous commercial choice was treated as within its commercial wisdom and not for substitution by the adjudicatory forum.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.