Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Section 96 IBC's interim moratorium does not apply to attachment proceedings under the MPID Act because those proceedings are not "in respect of any debt" and the record lacks a debtor-creditor relationship; the MPID regime operates as a public law civil forfeiture aimed at protecting depositors, so its attachment of mala fide transferred property is outside the moratorium and the trial court rightly refused a stay. The MPID Act, being within State List competence, is not repugnant to insolvency law here and its attachment vests property in the State, excluding such assets from the insolvency moratorium; the appeal was dismissed with costs for dilatory prosecution.
Section 96 IBC's interim moratorium does not apply to attachment proceedings under the MPID Act because those proceedings are not "in respect of any debt" and the record lacks a debtor-creditor relationship; the MPID regime operates as a public law civil forfeiture aimed at protecting depositors, so its attachment of mala fide transferred property is outside the moratorium and the trial court rightly refused a stay. The MPID Act, being within State List competence, is not repugnant to insolvency law here and its attachment vests property in the State, excluding such assets from the insolvency moratorium; the appeal was dismissed with costs for dilatory prosecution.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
