Search and seizure: abatement of earlier search bars use of prior seized material in later search-based assessments; relief limited to new documents f...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6601 to 6620 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Tribunal upheld the Resolution Professional's conduct in not admitting the Income Tax Department's claim during CIRP, finding repeated requests for assessment orders and that the Department delayed filing for admission before the Adjudicating Authority; therefore no irregularity by the RP. Applying the statutory waterfall mechanism to admitted liquidation and plan figures, the Tribunal concluded the plan allocation to the Department exceeded what it would have received pro rata had its claim been admitted, so the Department was not prejudiced in recoverable quantum and the appeal was dismissed.
Tribunal upheld the Resolution Professional's conduct in not admitting the Income Tax Department's claim during CIRP, finding repeated requests for assessment orders and that the Department delayed filing for admission before the Adjudicating Authority; therefore no irregularity by the RP. Applying the statutory waterfall mechanism to admitted liquidation and plan figures, the Tribunal concluded the plan allocation to the Department exceeded what it would have received pro rata had its claim been admitted, so the Department was not prejudiced in recoverable quantum and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
