Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Tribunal upheld the Resolution Professional's conduct in not admitting the Income Tax Department's claim during CIRP, finding repeated requests for assessment orders and that the Department delayed filing for admission before the Adjudicating Authority; therefore no irregularity by the RP. Applying the statutory waterfall mechanism to admitted liquidation and plan figures, the Tribunal concluded the plan allocation to the Department exceeded what it would have received pro rata had its claim been admitted, so the Department was not prejudiced in recoverable quantum and the appeal was dismissed.
Tribunal upheld the Resolution Professional's conduct in not admitting the Income Tax Department's claim during CIRP, finding repeated requests for assessment orders and that the Department delayed filing for admission before the Adjudicating Authority; therefore no irregularity by the RP. Applying the statutory waterfall mechanism to admitted liquidation and plan figures, the Tribunal concluded the plan allocation to the Department exceeded what it would have received pro rata had its claim been admitted, so the Department was not prejudiced in recoverable quantum and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
