Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Duty demand on alleged marble diversion fails where statements were inadmissible and post-import breach could not sustain penalties.
    Related party control and cooperative status in anti-dumping review turned on pledge security and relevant dumping data.
    Extended limitation not invocable where bona fide belief and no suppression were found in customs classification dispute.
    Interim moratorium and continuing guarantee: later insolvency filing was maintainable, and personal guarantor liability continued.
    Belated CIRP claim cannot reopen an approved resolution plan where the claimant knew of the process and treated settlement as final.
    Repayment plan requirement under personal guarantor insolvency upheld; one-time settlement offers cannot replace statutory compliance.
    Export proceeds realisation duties and director liability under FEMA were narrowed, with penalties partly sustained and reduced.
    May 1, 2026   Case Laws Money Laundering
    Tainted funds and proceeds of crime: attachment of a school building sustained where construction money came from an unlawful organisation.
    Service tax on bank commitment charges referred to Larger Bench amid conflicting Tribunal views on taxability.
    Refund claims for tax paid under mistake of law remain subject to limitation and unjust enrichment requirements.
    Extended limitation and exemption denial fail where records were disclosed, section 9D was ignored, and penalties lacked essential findings.
    Customs arrears recovery instructions tighten transfer of eligible cases to the Revenue Recovery Unit with complete records and certificates.
    Single Judicial Member Benches empowered to hear specified uncontested and procedural company and insolvency matters immediately
    Alternative statutory remedy bars writ relief where no exceptional ground or strong prima facie vires challenge is shown.
    GSTAT appeal remedy upheld as writ interference was refused in a GST refund dispute over document deficiencies and hearing opportunity.
    Electronic cash ledger deposit is not payment until appropriation; delayed GST attracts interest and wrong credit recovery was curtailed.
    Statutory university fees are not taxable supply under GST when collected for mandatory affiliation and NOC functions.
    Export duty assessment must follow the law and circular in force on the export date, not a later amendment.
    Reasoned refund orders are mandatory: non-speaking rejection of input tax credit refund was set aside and remanded for fresh hearing.
    Additional input tax credit must be passed on under anti-profiteering law; GST and interest were also upheld on refund.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

Tribunal upheld the Resolution Professional's conduct in not...

Claim verification in CIRP: delayed tax assessment led to non-admission but plan allocation exceeded the Department's likely pro rata recovery.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

IBC March 16, 2026 Case Laws AT
Tribunal upheld the Resolution Professional's conduct in not admitting the Income Tax Department's claim during CIRP, finding repeated requests for assessment orders and that the Department delayed filing for admission before the Adjudicating Authority; therefore no irregularity by the RP. Applying the statutory waterfall mechanism to admitted liquidation and plan figures, the Tribunal concluded the plan allocation to the Department exceeded what it would have received pro rata had its claim been admitted, so the Department was not prejudiced in recoverable quantum and the appeal was dismissed.

Topics

Acts Income Tax