Assessment time-barred u/s 153 due to missing competent-authority reference for Singapore exchange of information; assessment disallowed as barred by ...
Imported menthol-scented sweet supari classification dispute: seizure quashed, release for home consumption subject to duty bond; bank guarantee refus...
CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Supreme Court suo motu orders excluded 15 March 2020-28 February 2022 from limitation computation, so any balance limitation remaining on 15 March 2020 must be added to 1 March 2022 and becomes available from that date. Applying that principle to Section 95 applications where limitation expired during the excluded period, the balance period was calculated as of 15 March 2020 and added to 1 March 2022; applications falling within the recalculated periods are not time barred. Orders dismissing those applications as barred were set aside and the matters remitted for fresh consideration.
Supreme Court suo motu orders excluded 15 March 2020-28 February 2022 from limitation computation, so any balance limitation remaining on 15 March 2020 must be added to 1 March 2022 and becomes available from that date. Applying that principle to Section 95 applications where limitation expired during the excluded period, the balance period was calculated as of 15 March 2020 and added to 1 March 2022; applications falling within the recalculated periods are not time barred. Orders dismissing those applications as barred were set aside and the matters remitted for fresh consideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.