Concessional Basic Customs Duty on Ethernet switches: classification as enterprise switches upheld, challenge dismissed for lack of substantial law qu...
Insolvency petition based on admitted debt and default upheld; challenge for malicious initiation rejected, settlement may proceed under resolution fr...
Quashing of FIR and challenge to ECIR over alleged diversion of funds and preferential ESOP pricing dismissed after prima facie money-laundering findi...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6581 to 6600 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Supreme Court suo motu orders excluded 15 March 2020-28 February 2022 from limitation computation, so any balance limitation remaining on 15 March 2020 must be added to 1 March 2022 and becomes available from that date. Applying that principle to Section 95 applications where limitation expired during the excluded period, the balance period was calculated as of 15 March 2020 and added to 1 March 2022; applications falling within the recalculated periods are not time barred. Orders dismissing those applications as barred were set aside and the matters remitted for fresh consideration.
Supreme Court suo motu orders excluded 15 March 2020-28 February 2022 from limitation computation, so any balance limitation remaining on 15 March 2020 must be added to 1 March 2022 and becomes available from that date. Applying that principle to Section 95 applications where limitation expired during the excluded period, the balance period was calculated as of 15 March 2020 and added to 1 March 2022; applications falling within the recalculated periods are not time barred. Orders dismissing those applications as barred were set aside and the matters remitted for fresh consideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
