Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3301 to 3320 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Where a statutory appellate forum is constituted and functional, writ jurisdiction is inappropriate and petitioners must pursue the statutory remedy; the court directed the petitioner to comply with the mandatory pre condition in Section 112(8) (deposit requirement) and to file the appeal within the notified timeline, whereupon the GSTAT shall entertain the appeal if it is in order under Section 112 and applicable rules. The writ was disposed of with directions to deposit and file before the Tribunal; the court declined to rule on the merits of the first appellate order.
Where a statutory appellate forum is constituted and functional, writ jurisdiction is inappropriate and petitioners must pursue the statutory remedy; the court directed the petitioner to comply with the mandatory pre condition in Section 112(8) (deposit requirement) and to file the appeal within the notified timeline, whereupon the GSTAT shall entertain the appeal if it is in order under Section 112 and applicable rules. The writ was disposed of with directions to deposit and file before the Tribunal; the court declined to rule on the merits of the first appellate order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
