Habeas corpus challenge to arrest safeguards remains maintainable, but substantial compliance with reasons-to-believe requirement defeats the petition...
Where a statutory appellate forum is constituted and functional, writ jurisdiction is inappropriate and petitioners must pursue the statutory remedy; the court directed the petitioner to comply with the mandatory pre condition in Section 112(8) (deposit requirement) and to file the appeal within the notified timeline, whereupon the GSTAT shall entertain the appeal if it is in order under Section 112 and applicable rules. The writ was disposed of with directions to deposit and file before the Tribunal; the court declined to rule on the merits of the first appellate order.
Where a statutory appellate forum is constituted and functional, writ jurisdiction is inappropriate and petitioners must pursue the statutory remedy; the court directed the petitioner to comply with the mandatory pre condition in Section 112(8) (deposit requirement) and to file the appeal within the notified timeline, whereupon the GSTAT shall entertain the appeal if it is in order under Section 112 and applicable rules. The writ was disposed of with directions to deposit and file before the Tribunal; the court declined to rule on the merits of the first appellate order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
