Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Petitioner may seek restoration of GST registration by complying with the proviso to the relevant rule: furnish all pending returns and make full payment of tax, interest and late fees, whereupon the empowered officer may drop cancellation proceedings and pass an appropriate order in the prescribed form. The court exercised extraordinary jurisdiction because earlier appeal was dismissed as time-barred, directed petitioner to apply within two months, and held that limitation under the applicable limitation provision will run from this order (with a specified exception for the 2024-25 financial year). Order is fact-specific and not a precedent.
Petitioner may seek restoration of GST registration by complying with the proviso to the relevant rule: furnish all pending returns and make full payment of tax, interest and late fees, whereupon the empowered officer may drop cancellation proceedings and pass an appropriate order in the prescribed form. The court exercised extraordinary jurisdiction because earlier appeal was dismissed as time-barred, directed petitioner to apply within two months, and held that limitation under the applicable limitation provision will run from this order (with a specified exception for the 2024-25 financial year). Order is fact-specific and not a precedent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
