Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6541 to 6560 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Characterisation of Common Area Maintenance (CAM) charges as payments for services relating to upkeep, cleanliness, utilities and maintenance leads to their classification as contractual payments subject to TDS under Section 194C rather than as rent under Section 194I; the Tribunal applied this legal principle and deleted the assessment addition. The Tribunal relied on coordinate Bench precedents in the assessee's own case and noted that the High Court dismissed the Revenue's challenge to that line of decisions, reinforcing that CAM charges cannot be characterised as rent and that the Revenue's appeal must be dismissed for the year under review.
Characterisation of Common Area Maintenance (CAM) charges as payments for services relating to upkeep, cleanliness, utilities and maintenance leads to their classification as contractual payments subject to TDS under Section 194C rather than as rent under Section 194I; the Tribunal applied this legal principle and deleted the assessment addition. The Tribunal relied on coordinate Bench precedents in the assessee's own case and noted that the High Court dismissed the Revenue's challenge to that line of decisions, reinforcing that CAM charges cannot be characterised as rent and that the Revenue's appeal must be dismissed for the year under review.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
