Penalty for estimation of income and disallowances for tax non-deduction clarified: estimation-based penalties not sustainable; additions without conc...
Managerial remuneration disallowance under s.40A(2)(b) challenged over alleged tax-avoidance; appellate decision restored deletion of addition for dir...
Reopening under reassessment provisions was upheld where the Assessing Officer relied on tangible seized material, printouts and a statement recorded during GST proceedings plus information from a third party, providing a prima facie basis to form belief that income escaped assessment; retraction of the statement did not, absent evidence of coercion, negate the seized material and did not vitiate the reopening. The revenue's adoption of the valuation determined by CGST/Central Excise was accepted in the assessee's hands, and a conservative job work charge at the lower end of the 4%-12% market range (adjusted for diamonds) was sustained.
Reopening under reassessment provisions was upheld where the Assessing Officer relied on tangible seized material, printouts and a statement recorded during GST proceedings plus information from a third party, providing a prima facie basis to form belief that income escaped assessment; retraction of the statement did not, absent evidence of coercion, negate the seized material and did not vitiate the reopening. The revenue's adoption of the valuation determined by CGST/Central Excise was accepted in the assessee's hands, and a conservative job work charge at the lower end of the 4%-12% market range (adjusted for diamonds) was sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
