Penalty under section 271(1)(c) deleted where income was disclosed in section 153A returns and remaining additions were only estimated or computationa...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4561 to 4580 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reopening under reassessment provisions was upheld where the Assessing Officer relied on tangible seized material, printouts and a statement recorded during GST proceedings plus information from a third party, providing a prima facie basis to form belief that income escaped assessment; retraction of the statement did not, absent evidence of coercion, negate the seized material and did not vitiate the reopening. The revenue's adoption of the valuation determined by CGST/Central Excise was accepted in the assessee's hands, and a conservative job work charge at the lower end of the 4%-12% market range (adjusted for diamonds) was sustained.
Reopening under reassessment provisions was upheld where the Assessing Officer relied on tangible seized material, printouts and a statement recorded during GST proceedings plus information from a third party, providing a prima facie basis to form belief that income escaped assessment; retraction of the statement did not, absent evidence of coercion, negate the seized material and did not vitiate the reopening. The revenue's adoption of the valuation determined by CGST/Central Excise was accepted in the assessee's hands, and a conservative job work charge at the lower end of the 4%-12% market range (adjusted for diamonds) was sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
