Regulatory consolidation for investment advisers: SEBI issues master circular consolidating guidance and prescribing compliance, reporting, fees and s...
Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Condonation of delay was held appropriate where the taxpayer...
Condonation of Delay: Tribunal directed condonation where rectification proceedings were pursued, ordering merits adjudication after opportunity to be heard.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Condonation of delay was held appropriate where the taxpayer pursued rectification proceedings within time, and the record showed absence of negligence or mala fides; this constituted sufficient cause to admit the appeal for adjudication on merits. The Tribunal set aside the appellate authority's refusal to condone delay and remitted the matter with a direction to condone the delay and decide the appeal on merits after affording the taxpayer a reasonable opportunity to be heard. The operative effect is reinstatement of the appeal for merits consideration due to adequate cause for delay.
Condonation of delay was held appropriate where the taxpayer pursued rectification proceedings within time, and the record showed absence of negligence or mala fides; this constituted sufficient cause to admit the appeal for adjudication on merits. The Tribunal set aside the appellate authority's refusal to condone delay and remitted the matter with a direction to condone the delay and decide the appeal on merits after affording the taxpayer a reasonable opportunity to be heard. The operative effect is reinstatement of the appeal for merits consideration due to adequate cause for delay.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.