Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Validity of reopening adjudication after issuance of an SVLDRS Discharge Certificate was contested; the HC held the Discharge Certificate issuance, following acceptance, determination and payment under SVLDRS, was a determinative event the adjudicating authority had to consider and its failure rendered the original adjudication unsustainable, so the reopening order was set aside. The court also held that excluding the scheme solely because the show cause notice post dated the cut off contradicted CBIC guidance where the SVLDRS process was completed, and the appellate exclusion on that ground was set aside.
Validity of reopening adjudication after issuance of an SVLDRS Discharge Certificate was contested; the HC held the Discharge Certificate issuance, following acceptance, determination and payment under SVLDRS, was a determinative event the adjudicating authority had to consider and its failure rendered the original adjudication unsustainable, so the reopening order was set aside. The court also held that excluding the scheme solely because the show cause notice post dated the cut off contradicted CBIC guidance where the SVLDRS process was completed, and the appellate exclusion on that ground was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.