Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Rule 86A may be invoked only where credit in the electronic...
Restriction of Input Tax Credit under Rule 86A applies only to fraudulently or ineligible availed credit; mere wrongful recipient availment is insufficient.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Rule 86A may be invoked only where credit in the electronic credit ledger has been fraudulently availed or is otherwise ineligible under the rule's specified conditions (for example, documents from a non-existent person, no receipt of goods/services, tax not paid, recipient non-existent, or lack of prescribed documents); where allegations concern only wrongful availment by the recipient of invoices and not fraudulent availment or ineligibility by the invoicing taxpayer, Rule 86A cannot be validly applied. Applying that principle, the notice invoking Rule 86A against the petitioner was without jurisdiction and the blocked electronic credit ledger must be unblocked, with other departmental contentions left open.
Rule 86A may be invoked only where credit in the electronic credit ledger has been fraudulently availed or is otherwise ineligible under the rule's specified conditions (for example, documents from a non-existent person, no receipt of goods/services, tax not paid, recipient non-existent, or lack of prescribed documents); where allegations concern only wrongful availment by the recipient of invoices and not fraudulent availment or ineligibility by the invoicing taxpayer, Rule 86A cannot be validly applied. Applying that principle, the notice invoking Rule 86A against the petitioner was without jurisdiction and the blocked electronic credit ledger must be unblocked, with other departmental contentions left open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.