Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Rule 86A may be invoked only where credit in the electronic...
Restriction of Input Tax Credit under Rule 86A applies only to fraudulently or ineligible availed credit; mere wrongful recipient availment is insufficient.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Rule 86A may be invoked only where credit in the electronic credit ledger has been fraudulently availed or is otherwise ineligible under the rule's specified conditions (for example, documents from a non-existent person, no receipt of goods/services, tax not paid, recipient non-existent, or lack of prescribed documents); where allegations concern only wrongful availment by the recipient of invoices and not fraudulent availment or ineligibility by the invoicing taxpayer, Rule 86A cannot be validly applied. Applying that principle, the notice invoking Rule 86A against the petitioner was without jurisdiction and the blocked electronic credit ledger must be unblocked, with other departmental contentions left open.
Rule 86A may be invoked only where credit in the electronic credit ledger has been fraudulently availed or is otherwise ineligible under the rule's specified conditions (for example, documents from a non-existent person, no receipt of goods/services, tax not paid, recipient non-existent, or lack of prescribed documents); where allegations concern only wrongful availment by the recipient of invoices and not fraudulent availment or ineligibility by the invoicing taxpayer, Rule 86A cannot be validly applied. Applying that principle, the notice invoking Rule 86A against the petitioner was without jurisdiction and the blocked electronic credit ledger must be unblocked, with other departmental contentions left open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.