Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The explanation to Entry No.234 prescribes treating supplies of Solar Power Generating Systems as subject to a statutory 70:30 apportionment between goods and services, producing a uniform effective tax rate of 8.9% on the gross consideration; this apportionment applies even where supplies arise under contracts described as works contracts. The Court set aside the impugned assessment for April 2018-March 2020 and remanded to the Assessing Authority to recompute tax by applying the 70:30 split and 8.9% effective rate on gross consideration and to verify whether correct tax and interest have been paid. The movable/immovable character of the contracts was left open.
The explanation to Entry No.234 prescribes treating supplies of Solar Power Generating Systems as subject to a statutory 70:30 apportionment between goods and services, producing a uniform effective tax rate of 8.9% on the gross consideration; this apportionment applies even where supplies arise under contracts described as works contracts. The Court set aside the impugned assessment for April 2018-March 2020 and remanded to the Assessing Authority to recompute tax by applying the 70:30 split and 8.9% effective rate on gross consideration and to verify whether correct tax and interest have been paid. The movable/immovable character of the contracts was left open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.