Condonation of Delay: Tribunal directed condonation where rectification proceedings were pursued, ordering merits adjudication after opportunity to be...
Restriction of Input Tax Credit under Rule 86A applies only to fraudulently or ineligible availed credit; mere wrongful recipient availment is insuffi...
Where a scheme of amalgamation resulted in dissolution of the...
Business reorganisation requires recognition of successor's modified return; draft orders against dissolved transferor quashed and fresh review directed.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Where a scheme of amalgamation resulted in dissolution of the transferor and filing of modified returns by the successor, assessment proceedings must recognise the business reorganisation and the modified return; draft assessment and giving-effect orders issued in names of separate pre-amalgamation entities were quashed as inconsistent with that statutory scheme. The successor's modified return filed under the reorganisation framework must be examined by the Transfer Pricing Officer and a fresh merits order passed, after which the taxpayer may approach the Dispute Resolution mechanism or accept the order. Proceedings against dissolved transferor risking dual demands are impermissible.
Where a scheme of amalgamation resulted in dissolution of the transferor and filing of modified returns by the successor, assessment proceedings must recognise the business reorganisation and the modified return; draft assessment and giving-effect orders issued in names of separate pre-amalgamation entities were quashed as inconsistent with that statutory scheme. The successor's modified return filed under the reorganisation framework must be examined by the Transfer Pricing Officer and a fresh merits order passed, after which the taxpayer may approach the Dispute Resolution mechanism or accept the order. Proceedings against dissolved transferor risking dual demands are impermissible.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.