Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Effective service requirement: officers must explore alternative service modes beyond the GST portal and afford personal hearing; non-compliance voids...
Deduction for capital expenditure on scientific research under...
Pre-commencement R&D deduction denied where business had not commenced; deeming benefit requires tangible start of manufacture or commercial exploitation.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Deduction for capital expenditure on scientific research under section 35(1)(iv) is subject to the deeming rule only where the taxpayer has in fact commenced the business that will exploit the R&D; the deeming benefit for expenditure in the three years prior hinges on an ascertainable start of manufacture or commercial exploitation. The Tribunal held that absence of purchases, sales, closing stock, and only capital work in progress and unbilled dossier revenue showed no commencement; it allowed the Revenue's appeal, reversed the CIT(A) and upheld the AO's disallowance for AY 2018 19.
Deduction for capital expenditure on scientific research under section 35(1)(iv) is subject to the deeming rule only where the taxpayer has in fact commenced the business that will exploit the R&D; the deeming benefit for expenditure in the three years prior hinges on an ascertainable start of manufacture or commercial exploitation. The Tribunal held that absence of purchases, sales, closing stock, and only capital work in progress and unbilled dossier revenue showed no commencement; it allowed the Revenue's appeal, reversed the CIT(A) and upheld the AO's disallowance for AY 2018 19.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
