Person chargeable with duty must be the importer at importation; subsequent purchasers cannot be held liable where beneficial owner rules did not appl...
Deduction for capital expenditure on scientific research under...
Pre-commencement R&D deduction denied where business had not commenced; deeming benefit requires tangible start of manufacture or commercial exploitation.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Deduction for capital expenditure on scientific research under section 35(1)(iv) is subject to the deeming rule only where the taxpayer has in fact commenced the business that will exploit the R&D; the deeming benefit for expenditure in the three years prior hinges on an ascertainable start of manufacture or commercial exploitation. The Tribunal held that absence of purchases, sales, closing stock, and only capital work in progress and unbilled dossier revenue showed no commencement; it allowed the Revenue's appeal, reversed the CIT(A) and upheld the AO's disallowance for AY 2018 19.
Deduction for capital expenditure on scientific research under section 35(1)(iv) is subject to the deeming rule only where the taxpayer has in fact commenced the business that will exploit the R&D; the deeming benefit for expenditure in the three years prior hinges on an ascertainable start of manufacture or commercial exploitation. The Tribunal held that absence of purchases, sales, closing stock, and only capital work in progress and unbilled dossier revenue showed no commencement; it allowed the Revenue's appeal, reversed the CIT(A) and upheld the AO's disallowance for AY 2018 19.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
