Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT held that the deeming fiction of deemed valuation cannot be invoked where the stamp valuation is demonstrably erroneous and subsequently rectified; the original inflated stamp duty value lost sanctity and the addition under the deeming provision was deleted. On the beneficial exemption, the tribunal applied substance-over-form: for under construction flats purchased from a builder the acquisition is substantially effected on completion and possession within the statutory period, and the proviso excluding the exemption for ownership of more than one house was not attracted on the admitted facts; exemption under the residential capital gains provision allowed. Consequentially the penalty based solely on the deleted additions was deleted.
ITAT held that the deeming fiction of deemed valuation cannot be invoked where the stamp valuation is demonstrably erroneous and subsequently rectified; the original inflated stamp duty value lost sanctity and the addition under the deeming provision was deleted. On the beneficial exemption, the tribunal applied substance-over-form: for under construction flats purchased from a builder the acquisition is substantially effected on completion and possession within the statutory period, and the proviso excluding the exemption for ownership of more than one house was not attracted on the admitted facts; exemption under the residential capital gains provision allowed. Consequentially the penalty based solely on the deleted additions was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.