Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
ITAT held that the deeming fiction of deemed valuation cannot be invoked where the stamp valuation is demonstrably erroneous and subsequently rectified; the original inflated stamp duty value lost sanctity and the addition under the deeming provision was deleted. On the beneficial exemption, the tribunal applied substance-over-form: for under construction flats purchased from a builder the acquisition is substantially effected on completion and possession within the statutory period, and the proviso excluding the exemption for ownership of more than one house was not attracted on the admitted facts; exemption under the residential capital gains provision allowed. Consequentially the penalty based solely on the deleted additions was deleted.
ITAT held that the deeming fiction of deemed valuation cannot be invoked where the stamp valuation is demonstrably erroneous and subsequently rectified; the original inflated stamp duty value lost sanctity and the addition under the deeming provision was deleted. On the beneficial exemption, the tribunal applied substance-over-form: for under construction flats purchased from a builder the acquisition is substantially effected on completion and possession within the statutory period, and the proviso excluding the exemption for ownership of more than one house was not attracted on the admitted facts; exemption under the residential capital gains provision allowed. Consequentially the penalty based solely on the deleted additions was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.