Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Mandating a digital signature to complete an e-assessment is a jurisdictional formality; where the assessment order, computation and demand notice lacked the mandatory digital signature and were effectively antedated, the reassessment was held time-barred and invalid. Separately, the tribunal upheld the appellate finding allowing an extraordinary business loss for fire damage to the extent supported by documentary evidence and insurer reimbursement, concluding revenue failed to overturn those factual findings. The revenue appeal was dismissed, the reassessment quashed for want of mandatory signature and limitation, and the deletion of the addition for the exceptional loss sustained.
Mandating a digital signature to complete an e-assessment is a jurisdictional formality; where the assessment order, computation and demand notice lacked the mandatory digital signature and were effectively antedated, the reassessment was held time-barred and invalid. Separately, the tribunal upheld the appellate finding allowing an extraordinary business loss for fire damage to the extent supported by documentary evidence and insurer reimbursement, concluding revenue failed to overturn those factual findings. The revenue appeal was dismissed, the reassessment quashed for want of mandatory signature and limitation, and the deletion of the addition for the exceptional loss sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.