International transaction characterisation of domestic divestment of support services business rejected; transaction between resident associated enter...
Minimum Import Price restrictions for Black Pepper, Areca-nuts and Apples upheld; procedural laying failure not fatal, notifications to be placed befo...
Transaction value between related persons requires market-equivalent pricing; importer must prove declared value mirrors ordinary international trade ...
Classification of exported insecticides under export tariff affirmed; reclassification and related penalties set aside and MEIS scrip jurisdiction rec...
Misclassification between copra and dry coconut: customs recovery and re-valuation quashed for lack of prior licensing-authority invalidation, appeals...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6921 to 6940 of 96332 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Retrospective cancellation of GST registration cannot be exercised mechanically; a show cause notice must disclose any proposal for retrospective effect, identify or supply the material relied upon and afford a hearing, and any cancellation order must state reasons showing application of mind. An order that merely reproduces the notice or fails to supply supporting documents is non-speaking and unsustainable. Writ jurisdiction may be exercised despite availability of alternate remedies in exceptional cases where absence of fair notice, non-supply of material and a non-speaking order cause prejudice. The impugned retrospective cancellation was set aside; authorities may re-proceed only after proper notice, material and hearing.
Retrospective cancellation of GST registration cannot be exercised mechanically; a show cause notice must disclose any proposal for retrospective effect, identify or supply the material relied upon and afford a hearing, and any cancellation order must state reasons showing application of mind. An order that merely reproduces the notice or fails to supply supporting documents is non-speaking and unsustainable. Writ jurisdiction may be exercised despite availability of alternate remedies in exceptional cases where absence of fair notice, non-supply of material and a non-speaking order cause prejudice. The impugned retrospective cancellation was set aside; authorities may re-proceed only after proper notice, material and hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.