Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Retrospective cancellation of GST registration cannot be exercised mechanically; a show cause notice must specifically propose retrospective cancellation and disclose the material relied upon, and any cancellation order must record reasons and evidence of application of mind. A cryptic or non speaking order based on grounds not disclosed in the notice and without supply of supporting documents is unsustainable; the impugned cancellation was set aside but authorities may proceed afresh after serving proper notice and affording an opportunity of hearing. The High Court also held writ jurisdiction available despite an alternate remedy in the circumstances.
Retrospective cancellation of GST registration cannot be exercised mechanically; a show cause notice must specifically propose retrospective cancellation and disclose the material relied upon, and any cancellation order must record reasons and evidence of application of mind. A cryptic or non speaking order based on grounds not disclosed in the notice and without supply of supporting documents is unsustainable; the impugned cancellation was set aside but authorities may proceed afresh after serving proper notice and affording an opportunity of hearing. The High Court also held writ jurisdiction available despite an alternate remedy in the circumstances.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.