Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Where a GST-registered company ceases to exist on amalgamation, its GST registration is to be treated as deemed cancelled from the merger effective date and orders framed in the name of the non-existent entity are invalid; the Revenue must make the successor's GST registration operational and upload adjudication orders and any demands against the successor's GST number, which the successor must contest or discharge according to law. Further, limitation does not bar either party from raising or contesting claims arising from those uploaded orders in view of Section 75(3) of the CGST Act, and the petitioner remains free to pursue remedies.
Where a GST-registered company ceases to exist on amalgamation, its GST registration is to be treated as deemed cancelled from the merger effective date and orders framed in the name of the non-existent entity are invalid; the Revenue must make the successor's GST registration operational and upload adjudication orders and any demands against the successor's GST number, which the successor must contest or discharge according to law. Further, limitation does not bar either party from raising or contesting claims arising from those uploaded orders in view of Section 75(3) of the CGST Act, and the petitioner remains free to pursue remedies.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.