Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Contravention of foreign exchange rules in crossborder diamond payments; appellate tribunal reduces one appellant's penalty for delay and proportional...
Where a GST-registered company ceases to exist on amalgamation, its GST registration is to be treated as deemed cancelled from the merger effective date and orders framed in the name of the non-existent entity are invalid; the Revenue must make the successor's GST registration operational and upload adjudication orders and any demands against the successor's GST number, which the successor must contest or discharge according to law. Further, limitation does not bar either party from raising or contesting claims arising from those uploaded orders in view of Section 75(3) of the CGST Act, and the petitioner remains free to pursue remedies.
Where a GST-registered company ceases to exist on amalgamation, its GST registration is to be treated as deemed cancelled from the merger effective date and orders framed in the name of the non-existent entity are invalid; the Revenue must make the successor's GST registration operational and upload adjudication orders and any demands against the successor's GST number, which the successor must contest or discharge according to law. Further, limitation does not bar either party from raising or contesting claims arising from those uploaded orders in view of Section 75(3) of the CGST Act, and the petitioner remains free to pursue remedies.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.