Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Denial of charitable exemption turned on whether the appellant's activities were charitable or primarily professional advisory services and on retention of donations vis-a -vis the applicable monetary threshold for incidental commercial activity. The court accepted the Assessing Officer's arithmetic of total donations and retained amount against the monetary threshold from precedent, found no retention but a deficit in the relevant years, and concluded that exemption for charitable purpose should not be denied. Both substantive questions for the year were decided for the assessee and the appeal was allowed without remand.
Denial of charitable exemption turned on whether the appellant's activities were charitable or primarily professional advisory services and on retention of donations vis-a -vis the applicable monetary threshold for incidental commercial activity. The court accepted the Assessing Officer's arithmetic of total donations and retained amount against the monetary threshold from precedent, found no retention but a deficit in the relevant years, and concluded that exemption for charitable purpose should not be denied. Both substantive questions for the year were decided for the assessee and the appeal was allowed without remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.