Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6541 to 6560 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Tribunal applied the commercial and accounting principle that sale of stock-in-trade is recognised when possession is handed over and consideration is received, and held that later formal registration does not create accrual of business income in a subsequent year. On the undisputed facts the assessee received consideration and delivered possession in the earlier year, VAT assessment corroborated that recognition, and the assessing officer failed to demonstrate any accrual in the impugned year. A provision akin to replacement-value assessment was inapplicable where no transfer occurred in the impugned year, and the same income cannot be taxed twice; revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Tribunal applied the commercial and accounting principle that sale of stock-in-trade is recognised when possession is handed over and consideration is received, and held that later formal registration does not create accrual of business income in a subsequent year. On the undisputed facts the assessee received consideration and delivered possession in the earlier year, VAT assessment corroborated that recognition, and the assessing officer failed to demonstrate any accrual in the impugned year. A provision akin to replacement-value assessment was inapplicable where no transfer occurred in the impugned year, and the same income cannot be taxed twice; revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.