Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Cross country pipeline classification and ITC entitlement: pipelines outside factory treated as immovable, ITC disallowed under Section 17 restriction...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6181 to 6200 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Liability for non fulfilment of EPCG export obligations was...
Liability for EPCG export shortfall: duty and interest sustained, but confiscation and penalties quashed where no fraud and causes beyond importer control.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Liability for non fulfilment of EPCG export obligations was confirmed, with the importer held liable for differential customs duty and unpaid interest; the appellant had deposited duty but interest remains recoverable by revenue. Separately, confiscation of goods, redemption fine and penalty were set aside because non fulfilment arose from circumstances beyond the importer's control and there was no allegation or finding of fraud, applying the Tribunal's prior approach to similar EPCG cases; duty and interest liability remains enforceable while punitive measures were quashed.
Liability for non fulfilment of EPCG export obligations was confirmed, with the importer held liable for differential customs duty and unpaid interest; the appellant had deposited duty but interest remains recoverable by revenue. Separately, confiscation of goods, redemption fine and penalty were set aside because non fulfilment arose from circumstances beyond the importer's control and there was no allegation or finding of fraud, applying the Tribunal's prior approach to similar EPCG cases; duty and interest liability remains enforceable while punitive measures were quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.