Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act failed to establish a legally enforceable debt because mandatory corporate records, a board resolution, contemporaneous calculations or audited entries proving the claimed brokerage were absent; unsigned and belated letters bore indicia of fabrication and thus the pleaded material did not identify how any amount became payable, rendering the proceeding an abuse of process. Consequently the statutory presumption envisaged for negotiable instruments did not arise where the primary onus to set out particulars was not discharged, and no evidence converted company liabilities into the director's personal liability; the complaint was quashed.
Complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act failed to establish a legally enforceable debt because mandatory corporate records, a board resolution, contemporaneous calculations or audited entries proving the claimed brokerage were absent; unsigned and belated letters bore indicia of fabrication and thus the pleaded material did not identify how any amount became payable, rendering the proceeding an abuse of process. Consequently the statutory presumption envisaged for negotiable instruments did not arise where the primary onus to set out particulars was not discharged, and no evidence converted company liabilities into the director's personal liability; the complaint was quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.